| By WordsOntheWeb
Many have heralded the Government's new
family-friendly policies as a step in the
right direction - but what about the impact on
the employers that are responsible for
implementing these policies? A new study by
the Institute of Directors (IoD) finds that
SMEs are particularly affected by the cost of
family-friendly policies. We examine why SMEs
are hardest hit and what they can do to reduce
costs while complying with the Government
regulations.
First, let's look at exactly what these
family friendly policies are:
- the most important condition is that
women cannot be dismissed or selected for
redundancy for any reason connected to
pregnancy, childbirth or maternity leave
- a woman is entitled to paid time off for
ante-natal appointments and to special
health and safety protections on the job
- she is entitled to 18 weeks maternity
leave, as long as the employer is given 21
days notice, and to return to her same
job. In April 2003, this will be extended
to 26 weeks
- she is entitled to an additional 29
weeks from the birth of the child if she
has been with her employer for at least a
year and 11 weeks. After the additional
maternity leave, the women's employer is
required to give her the same job unless
it can be proved that it is not reasonably
practicable in which case a suitable
alternative job on similar terms and
conditions must be offered
- a woman is entitled to Statutory
Maternity Pay (SMP) if she has been with
her employer for at least 26 weeks before
the qualifying week of her pregnancy (15
weeks before the due date). She is paid
for a total of 18 weeks, the first six at
90 per cent of her average earnings and £60.20
a week for the last 12 weeks. In April
2002, this will be raised to £75 week and
to £100 a week in April 2003
- if a woman is not eligible for the SMP,
she may be able to claim the Maternity
Allowance (MA) from the Benefits Agency.
Unemployed and self-employed women may
also be eligible for MA
- in April 2003, fathers will be entitled
to two weeks paternity leave, paid at £100
a week. And adoptive parents will be
allowed to take maternity leave and pay
In return for these benefits, a woman is
expected to give her the employer the notice
required by her contract if she decides not to
return to work.
And if the woman is away from work for a
pregnancy related illness in the last six
weeks of the pregnancy, the employer is
allowed to start the maternity leave
immediately.
After the maternity leave, if a woman needs
to return to work part-time due to childcare,
her employer is required to give her request
serious consideration or the woman may have a
case of Indirect Sexual Harassment.
These are the guidelines set down by the
Government for all business. But for SMEs, the
rules are slightly different. Most employers
are reimbursed the SMP at 92 per cent but
businesses that pay in less than £20,000 a
year in NHS benefits are reimbursed at 105 per
cent in order to help cover costs. And
businesses employing five or fewer people are
not required to keep a woman's job open after
the AML.
While those two exceptions may help SMEs
defray some costs caused by the
family-friendly policies, the study by the IoD
claims that that is not enough. Large
companies are better able to deal with the
administration of these policies as they
already have accountants, solicitors, human
resources personnel, etc in place. SMEs are
unlikely to have these resources in house and
therefore must pay to outsource. And where
large companies may have the staff to cover
the responsibilities of the woman on maternity
leave, a SME will most likely have to hire a
temporary worker to fill the woman's job until
she returns.
Ruth Lea, head of the policy unit at the
IoD, worries about the effects these costs
will have, not only on the businesses but on
female employees as well.
"British employers are, on the whole,
flexible about employee working practices. But
there are limits, especially when you're a
small business and dealing with key
employees," she said.
"Every employee, man or woman, should
understand this. The current maternity rights
are already putting employers off recruiting
youngish women Any further work-life
balance regulation could only damage business
and, ironically, the groups, especially women
of prime child-bearing age, that such
regulation is intended to help."
While the IoD does not advocate any further
regulation, it does support the idea of
family-friendly policies in general - just
that they should be voluntary. Many businesses
already have similar policies in place because
they make good business sense. SMEs in
particular know the value of retaining loyal,
skilled employees. And employees in general
work better when they are happy and feel that
their employers care about their well-being,
resulting in reduced sickness and ad hoc
absences and increased productivity.
Also advocating these principles is the
Work - Life Balance Campaign, which has been
developed by the Department for Education and
Employment (DfEE) in partnership with
employers for work-life balance and does not
involve legislation but encourages employers
to explore ways to allow better work-life
balance for all. But while their goals are
similar to those of the IoD, they have
supported their campaign with information from
an Institute of Employment Services study that
claims that SMEs are actually helped by the
Government's family-friendly policies, some
small businesses saving up to £250,000 on
their budgets.
The IoD feels that while the regulations
may benefit some SMEs, in general companies
should be allowed to decide their own
policies. Richard Taylor, press officer at the
IoD, believes that blanket policies will not
work for everyone, so regulation should be
replaced with companies forging their own
policies between employer and employee that
are specific to the situation.
The IoD offers some services to its members
such as legal and tax advice that can help
ease the burden of having to outsource. But
other than the rollback of some of these
regulations, Taylor does not see many
solutions for SMEs to the difficulties caused
by family-friendly policies.
Christine Gowdridge, director of the
Maternity Alliance, does not see the necessity
for a change in legislation. "Most small
employers are already amazingly flexible
because they know their staff and care about
them. They are already operating
family-friendly policies, saying go home if
Billy is sick," she said.
Gowdridge is sceptical of IoD research,
saying that they always predict the worst when
new regulations are introduced. "We heard
the same thing when maternity leave was
introduced in 1975. But the birth rate hasn't
shot up and industry hasn't crumbled."
Copyright Lloyds TSB Bank plc 2001. All rights
reserved
|